Entries from January 2008

¨¨¨some ideas on LO/DE/LI/SO¨¨¨

January 30, 2008 · 1 Comment


I’ve been thinking about the residency project since last summer, when Markus told me about it. A few weeks later I met Michael and he invited me to participate in it.

 

 

 

 

To say honestly, I have never been involved in such kind of group - residence - work before. Working a lot with other artists together (it was mostly “long-time, duo-relationships”) I made different experiences but nowadays use to work alone.

 

 

 

Expecting to spend 3 weeks of intensive work with six other artists (half of them I haven’t even seen before) I came to the question: is it possible to get know that people before the event starts? That’s why I was positively surprised when Michael suggested to create this blog. Unfortunately, it took a couple of months before I have found myself able to join it. There are always some “long-time-frequency-waves” running parallel to the “short-ones” through my life. And all ideas, linked to this project are sequenced with those long waves inside my mind.

 

 

 

 

A few months ago I started to think about a textual event, that would precede our real one in Belgium the next summer. I found those short stories, where each one of us writes about him/herself as about the 3rd person very interesting. But that was not enough to start the communication process. So I started to write down my ideas on 4 basic frame-terms, that Michael proposed for the residency.

First I was thinking about one single text (pro person) where each one expresses his/her own experience and attitude toward Love/Death/Life/Soul. And I’m still sure, it would be great, if every one of us will post such writing. But as for my one, I found it growing bigger and bigger, so it is too long for one post, it’s too long for one to read it at once. And, besides that, it’s in russian. I use to write in russian when I dont have enough time to relax, to concentrate and have so many other things to do. So i divided the written stuff into 3 (or 4) parts. The idea is to publish one text after another with about 2 weeks tempo.

 

 

 

 

 

For those of you, who are English (American) native-speakers:

I hope you can excuse me if something is wrong or hard to understand. If the sentence is too long and has a monstrous construction. If THE article is missing or it is in THE wrong place. I have learned english at school more than 20 years ago, I have been only one week in England (since that time) and that was my only visit to the anglophone country.

The following text is the first one in the row. It is very pathetic. It probably reflects my “other” side because in the everyday life I’m just so unserious as serious this writing is.

 

 

010611-pantheon-dak.jpg
SOME IDEAS ON LO/DE/LI/SO … PT.I - META-LEVEL


Any cosmological narrative, striking through the culture as string starts with a word. Out of nothing starts the time. Out of the whiteness of blank paper, one letter after another appears the reflection of story, mirroring the act of creation. Sometimes it is just an ink-spot. Sometimes the word is wrong and could be erased or deleted with the backspace. “Out of nothing” are coming the basics and leading through their further development to the current moment. This process divides all created forms of being into inner and outer, future and past, reader and writer, creation and it’s consumption…

 

 

 

 

An Artist just as any creator in his work repeats the sujet, the basic pattern founding any cultural tradition. The act of creation stays there as the tower of Babylon, joining not only heaven and earth as elements of the same plane. It connects all those different levels, dimensions such as man, the nature that he created as well as the nature, that created himself.

 

 

 

A man conceives the world around through his compassion for it, looking for and taking place in it. He is a musical instrument and a musician playing it the same time. A man writes a text being the text himself.

 

 

 

 

One brave traveller, taking a vornehm into the world outside could meet, once, another one, who has started his voyage in opposite direction - to the inside world of himself. And even more: in the crossing where they meet they could change their directions adding or multiplying them. The “inner” one starts his journey also in outer space and the “outer” one continues his expedition finding another dimension of the world inside himself.

 

 

 

 

Somehow every human being is a traveller. But most of us are choosing only one direction and this choice is far to be conscious.

Fear of the “other” who also reflects the “dark side” of self prevents peole to come over to the crossing/meeting point.

Is it possible to reach this point without love? Or is it first this point, which allows to see no difference between yourself and the other and, so, be able to love life as such? To be able to see the strings of light which connect every form of life, showing the way between two abysses - the fear of life and the fear of death… to be able to see the strings of souls…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

lawren-s-harris-abstract-painting-no-20.gif

 

Understood in the paradigm of Aristotelian logic, the language can not describe adequate all those phenomena, which lays behind the horizont of time and space. The language itself, even if we try to imagine it alienated from it’s bearer, is changing and transforming in time and space anyway. To break through into another (spiritual) dimension we have to use a kind of non-euclidian geometry of language. Abstract models and patterns used in order to realize some complexe phenomena are projections of higher dimensions into the space of our everyday perception. It is not objective but truly reflects the poly-dimensional object on the surface.

 

 

 

I do not belong to any religion or confession. Born and grew up in a family of scientists, I inherited a pragmatical way of thinking, based on experiment or, rather, experience. Instead of blind faith I learned to know. Probably that ’s why it took almost 30 years before I could prove elementary basics the other people learned to believe in from their childhood. In my life I have brought those pragmatical principles to their marginal or sometimes even absurd developments. But it is this invaluable experience, which I got in my life-travel, which is founding my inner world and it’s projection to the world outside in/through my artworks.

 

eclips-misha-shenbrot.jpg

Misha Shenbrot

Categories: art · death · life · love · misha · soul

on the subject of mortality

January 24, 2008 · 1 Comment

I decided to post a poem by Emily Dickinson in reaction to the google ads on our blog about death and cleaning up after a death?

 Death is a dialogue between

The spirt and the dust.

“Dissolve”, says Death.  The Spirit, “Sir,

I have another trust.”

Death doubts it, argues from the ground.

The Spirit turns away,

Just laying off, for evidence,

An overcoat of clay.

– Emily Dickinson

and while I am on the subject of “dust”

I close my eyes, only for a moment, and the moment’s gone
All my dreams, pass before my eyes, a curiosity
Dust in the wind, all they are is dust in the wind.
Same old song, just a drop of water in an endless sea
All we do, crumbles to the ground, though we refuse to see

Dust in the wind, all we are is dust in the wind

[Now] Don’t hang on, nothing lasts forever but the earth and sky
It slips away, and all your money won’t another minute buy.

Dust in the wind, all we are is dust in the wind
Dust in the wind, everything is dust in the wind.

Lyrics from the song “Dust in the wind”  by Kansas

– posted by Dustyn “the wind” Bork

Categories: Uncategorized

Recent Work

January 23, 2008 · 1 Comment

Untitled (10)Hey all:
I apoligize for neglecting to post on the blog. I like the going ons here. Mike, It was good to see your recent work as per Lou’s suggestion– I will follow suit and post some recent images/ work in progress. I have been continuing my experiments with pattern and surface. A few of these are etchings with plaid and patterning, I have a number of plates that I have that I can switch and recombine to explore color and layering.

less unless acid green and feel signals
These other two are fro a series of minimal relief prints (in progress). These black and white prints are floating relic-like shards with grid like patterning on them. In my work (unlike Mike) the “trash” is part of it. I recycle forms from found sources. I layer to build up a sort of history in the process. I am looking forward to working with all of you in the exchange. If you have commments,let me have it. –Dustyn

Untitled (1)

Categories: Creative Challenges · art · dustyn · printmaking · process
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Studio Views Jan 11 2008

January 11, 2008 · No Comments

Hi all, Lou suggested we add photos of works in progress, I thought I would kick it off. I am working out the final installation of a new show.

This was from today. I had originally planned to cut the wall in half but now I think I may draw on it and create an installation, that merges with the rest of the space. What you cannot see is the other side of the space is selectively painted white, although this view shows mostly the white area. I will have more details next week. No the trash is not part of it. At the moment I am just moving things around and working it all out.

michael markwick

Wall blocking entrance to space. Up until now, viewers could only peer through several holes.

markwick

Above View 1 wall on its way to something else.
michael markwick

Above: View 2

Categories: art · exhibitions · installation · michael · painting · process · studio

4 types of cultural consumers

January 7, 2008 · No Comments

I thought this might be  a topic to tackle, maybe not in this way, but just more thinking about the role of consumption…

 http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/article/290794

GOLDTHORPE-CHAN REPORT

TheStar.com | entertainment | Arts study a culture shock
Arts study a culture shock

Oxford University reports idea of upper class forming cultural elite no longer valid

Jan 05, 2008 04:30 AM


Forget class versus trash, the elite versus the masses.

Divide culture consumers into four new groups, says an international study Oxford University researchers released late last month that will have far-reaching results for arts support everywhere.

“Univores,” “Omnivores,” “Paucivores” and “Inactives” are the new categories we can all find ourselves in. Which one depends on whether we believe Britney is a huge tabloid star or an area in northwestern France where Impressionist painters spent their summers.

But no matter what group is discussed, the visual arts do not figure very high on anyone’s to-do list.

“In our report, we found that participation in the (higher) levels of all the arts is really quite low,” John Goldthorpe tells me on the phone from England.

“When it comes to the visual arts, you find there’s a sizeable part of the adult population that doesn’t participate at all.”

“Univores,” the largest of the four groups, consume great quantities of pop culture – TV, pop music and Hollywood flicks – and little else. “But there are no truly popular forms in the visual arts that have as wide a media exposure as does pop music,” says Goldthorpe. Tak Wing Chan was his colleague in the study for the Economic and Social Research Council in England.

“Omnivores,” the next biggest group, includes people who go to the ballet, symphony or opera on occasion while still buying lots of pop culture.

For purposes of the study, cultural consumption was split into three basic categories: theatre, dance and the movies; music of all sorts; and the visual arts.

Only “Paucivores,” a decidedly small group, may be found at a blockbuster museum opening. But that’s about the extent of it. Paucivores don’t care much for contemporary art.

The “Inactives,” are the Goldthorpe-Chan version of couch potatoes, hunkered down in front of the television day and night. They’re found in every culture. Along with the U.K., data was assembled in France, the Netherlands, Hungary, Israel, Chile and the United States and analyzed by 13 researchers.

In England, the report has caused something of a stir because it blew holes in the idea of an upper class forming a cultural elite.

“We are unable to identify any numerically significant group of cultural consumers whose consumption is essentially confined to high cultural forms and who reject, or at least do not participate in, more popular forms,” says the report.

Status counts, not class. And status is defined by income not by culture.

In short, the very idea of “pop culture” is a misnomer.

There is no pop culture. Pop is culture.

“Status is now attached to material consumption, not cultural consumption,” Goldthorpe tells me. “People with status show who they are though expensive cars and houses rather than by going to museums and the like.”

Indeed, the report itself hammers home the blunt truth that “income has no effect on determining” the kind of culture being consumed. The bottom line? People who could help symphonies survive or back the arts don’t want to.

They are “self-excluded,” says the report, “rather than socially excluded.”

Better education does little to change this bleak picture. “There is a sizeable number of people in this group who don’t participate” in the elite arts, Goldthorpe says

Why?

“The short answer is, I don’t know,” says Goldthorpe.

Unfortunately, the Chan-Goldthorpe report will play into the hands of reactionary politicians who question whether the arts should be funded at all, since no one gives a hoot about them.

Already the Labour government in Britain is showing signs of cutting back its cultural support as a way of funneling money to “the demands of the Olympic Games,” Goldthorpe says.

Categories: States of Active Inquiry · art